PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.07
0.06 - 0.24
1.89M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.60 | -0.04
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.58%
Revenue decline while SMR.AX shows 16.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-12.78%
Cost reduction while SMR.AX shows 242.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
46.64%
Positive growth while SMR.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
55.30%
Margin expansion while SMR.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.63%
Operating expenses growth while SMR.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.95%
Total costs reduction while SMR.AX shows 2.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while SMR.AX shows 119.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
21.94%
D&A growth less than half of SMR.AX's 73.90%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
105.79%
EBITDA growth while SMR.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.96%
EBITDA margin growth while SMR.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.24%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x SMR.AX's 71.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
101.48%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x SMR.AX's 75.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
26.87%
Other expenses change of 26.87% while SMR.AX maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
126.48%
Pre-tax income growth while SMR.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
128.04%
Pre-tax margin growth while SMR.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
251.28%
Tax expense growth while SMR.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
153.85%
Net income growth while SMR.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
157.03%
Net margin growth while SMR.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
154.17%
EPS growth while SMR.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
154.17%
Diluted EPS growth while SMR.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.57%
Share count reduction while SMR.AX shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.57%
Diluted share reduction while SMR.AX shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.