PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
8.7K / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.58%
Revenue decline while WHC.AX shows 53.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-12.78%
Cost reduction while WHC.AX shows 69.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
46.64%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x WHC.AX's 34.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
55.30%
Margin expansion while WHC.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.63%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of WHC.AX's 19.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-10.95%
Total costs reduction while WHC.AX shows 57.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
21.94%
D&A growth while WHC.AX reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
105.79%
EBITDA growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.96%
EBITDA margin growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.24%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WHC.AX's 43.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
101.48%
Operating margin growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.87%
Other expenses growth while WHC.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
126.48%
Pre-tax income growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
128.04%
Pre-tax margin growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
251.28%
Tax expense growth while WHC.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
153.85%
Net income growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
157.03%
Net margin growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
154.17%
EPS growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
154.17%
Diluted EPS growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.57%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.57%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.