0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
2.78M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-100.00%
Revenue decline while WHC.AX shows 0.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Gross profit decline while WHC.AX shows 181.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
Margin decline while WHC.AX shows 179.18% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.83%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
41.43%
Marketing expense growth 1.1-1.25x WHC.AX's 36.28%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
123.39%
Other expenses growth less than half of WHC.AX's 391.75%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
277.89%
Operating expenses growth less than half of WHC.AX's 10135.52%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
277.89%
Total costs growth above 1.5x WHC.AX's 27.76%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
57010.74%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x WHC.AX's 16.95%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
71.91%
D&A growth above 1.5x WHC.AX's 47.55%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
3.13%
EBITDA growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
EBITDA margin growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.60%
Operating income growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Operating margin growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-384.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.53%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Pre-tax margin growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-81.08%
Tax expense reduction while WHC.AX shows 32.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.84%
Net income growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Net margin growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.33%
EPS growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.33%
Diluted EPS growth while WHC.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.66%
Share count reduction below 50% of WHC.AX's 13.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
16.66%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of WHC.AX's 11.60%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.