TerraCom Limited (TER.AX)

0.060.00 (-3.13%)

TerraCom Limited (TER.AX) stock comprehensive Profitability Analysis including gross margin, operating margin, net margin, return on assets, return on equity, return on invested capital. Compare profitability against peers/competitors, industry and sector standards.

Moderate Bankruptcy RiskLow ProfitabilityModerate EfficiencyWeak GrowthModerate QualityAdequate Dividend ProfileIndustry Rank: 39.13%Sector Rank: 55.71%

ASX - Energy - Coal | Market Cap: 49.66M | Next Earnings Date: 26 Feb 2026

Day's Range

0.06 - 0.06

52-Week Range

0.06 - 0.24

Volume

8.7K / 3.59M (Avg.)

P/E Ratio | EPS

-1.55 | -0.04

Trending:

TER.AX Profitability Analysis - Compare Against NHC.AX

Comparison against NHC.AX

None SMR.AX YAL.AX NHC.AX CRN.AX WHC.AX

Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.

Return on Equity (ROE)

48.56%

Decreased from previous period

ROE above 1.5x NHC.AX's 16.61%. David Dodd would confirm if such superior profitability is sustainable.

Return on Assets (ROA)

22.81%

Decreased from previous period

ROA above 1.5x NHC.AX's 12.91%. David Dodd would verify if the company’s niche or scale drives superior asset efficiency.

Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)

35.16%

Decreased from previous period

ROCE above 1.5x NHC.AX's 21.26%. David Dodd would check if sustainable process or technology advantages are in play.

Gross Profit Margin

37.00%

Decreased from previous period

Gross margin 50-75% of NHC.AX's 62.85%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.

Operating Profit Margin

37.00%

Decreased from previous period

Operating margin 50-75% of NHC.AX's 53.43%. Martin Whitman would question competitiveness or cost discipline.

Net Profit Margin

35.28%

Decreased from previous period

Similar net margin to NHC.AX's 36.79%. Walter Schloss would conclude both firms have parallel cost-revenue structures.

Select Chart Metric:

TER.AX Profitability Analysis - Compare Against NHC.AX

Comparison against NHC.AX

None SMR.AX YAL.AX NHC.AX CRN.AX WHC.AX

Return on Equity (ROE)

48.56%

Decreased from previous period

ROE above 1.5x NHC.AX's 16.61%. David Dodd would confirm if such superior profitability is sustainable.

Return on Assets (ROA)

22.81%

Decreased from previous period

ROA above 1.5x NHC.AX's 12.91%. David Dodd would verify if the company’s niche or scale drives superior asset efficiency.

Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)

35.16%

Decreased from previous period

ROCE above 1.5x NHC.AX's 21.26%. David Dodd would check if sustainable process or technology advantages are in play.

Gross Profit Margin

37.00%

Decreased from previous period

Gross margin 50-75% of NHC.AX's 62.85%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.

Operating Profit Margin

37.00%

Decreased from previous period

Operating margin 50-75% of NHC.AX's 53.43%. Martin Whitman would question competitiveness or cost discipline.

Net Profit Margin

35.28%

Decreased from previous period

Similar net margin to NHC.AX's 36.79%. Walter Schloss would conclude both firms have parallel cost-revenue structures.

Select Chart Metric: