PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
2.78M / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-4.66
Negative P/E while Energy median is -0.89. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
1.13
P/S less than half the Energy median of 3.25. Walter Schloss would verify if this discount reflects fixable issues. Check margins versus peers.
2.85
P/B exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.78. Jim Chanos would check for potential asset write-down risks.
-12.12
Negative FCF while Energy median P/FCF is -0.62. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.
-15.95
Negative operating cash flow while Energy median P/OCF is 4.38. Seth Klarman would investigate operational improvement potential.
2.85
Fair value ratio exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.77. Jim Chanos would check for valuation bubble risks.
-5.37%
Negative earnings while Energy median yield is -2.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
-8.25%
Negative FCF while Energy median yield is -0.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate cash flow improvement potential.