PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.06 - 0.06
0.06 - 0.24
8.7K / 3.59M (Avg.)
-1.55 | -0.04
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-1.04
Negative P/E while Energy median is 1.19. Seth Klarman would scrutinize path to profitability versus peers.
0.27
P/S less than half the Energy median of 2.90. Walter Schloss would verify if this discount reflects fixable issues. Check margins versus peers.
-1.22
Negative equity while Energy median P/B is 1.25. Seth Klarman would investigate balance sheet restructuring potential.
6.38
P/FCF exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.45. Jim Chanos would check for cash flow sustainability risks.
2.54
P/OCF less than half the Energy median of 7.45. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if cash flows are sustainably strong.
-1.22
Negative fair value while Energy median is 1.25. Seth Klarman would investigate valuation model issues.
-24.14%
Negative earnings while Energy median yield is 1.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate path to profitability.
15.66%
FCF yield exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if high yield reflects hidden value.