PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Reveals whether the business's core operations generate sufficient cash to cover expenses, fund growth, and return capital to shareholders. Sustainable free cash flow is often a key indicator of long-term value creation.
-0.03
Negative OCF/share while KETL.L has 0.04. Joel Greenblatt would question the viability of operations in comparison.
-0.04
Negative FCF/share while KETL.L stands at 0.03. Joel Greenblatt would demand structural changes or cost cuts.
-62.58%
Negative ratio while KETL.L is 9.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question whether the firm’s OCF is negative or capex is abnormally large.
-0.26
Both companies are negative. Martin Whitman might see an entire niche with questionable earnings quality.
-4.61%
Negative ratio while KETL.L is 25.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s revenues or cash flows are fundamentally flawed.