PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.74%
Negative net income growth while KETL.L stands at 69.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-60.66%
Negative yoy D&A while KETL.L is 63.11%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.44%
Less working capital growth vs. KETL.L's 735.24%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.70%
Inventory growth of 10.70% while KETL.L is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.49%
Growth well above KETL.L's 46.92%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
6260.00%
Some yoy increase while KETL.L is negative at -261.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
113.67%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x KETL.L's 94.50%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-80.65%
Negative yoy CapEx while KETL.L is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.65%
We have some outflow growth while KETL.L is negative at -483.31%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-80.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with KETL.L at -643.35%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
70.63%
We repay more while KETL.L is negative at -57.77%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.