PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
27.46%
Net income growth of 27.46% while SOM.L is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
11.06%
D&A growth of 11.06% while SOM.L is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
112.28%
Working capital change of 112.28% while SOM.L is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
130.35%
AR growth of 130.35% while SOM.L is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
135.57%
Inventory growth of 135.57% while SOM.L is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-6996.30%
Negative yoy AP while SOM.L is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.82%
Growth of 40.82% while SOM.L is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
632.26%
CFO growth of 632.26% while SOM.L is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
29.18%
CapEx growth of 29.18% while SOM.L is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.51%
We reduce yoy invests while SOM.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2532.08%
Issuance growth of 2532.08% while SOM.L is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.