Warpaint London PLC (W7L.L)

Warpaint London PLC (W7L.L) stock comprehensive Forecast and Price Target with Analyst Ratings, Revenue Estimates, and complete financial and advanced discounted cashflow forecasts for up to 10 years.

Trending:

Revenue

125.72M

Lower than competitor

Worse than VTU.L's revenue of 6.07B.

Revenue Growth Rate

18.46%

Higher than competitor

Better than VTU.L's revenue growth rate of 13.41%.

EBITDA

19.02M

Lower than competitor

Worse than VTU.L's ebitda of 128.19M.

EBITDA Margin

15.13%

Higher than competitor

Better than VTU.L's ebitda margin of 2.11%.

EBIT

10.97M

Lower than competitor

Worse than VTU.L's ebit of 75.02M.

EBIT Margin

8.73%

Higher than competitor

Better than VTU.L's ebit margin of 1.24%.

Depreciation

8.05M

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's depreciation of 53.16M.

Total Cash

11.33M

Lower than competitor

Worse than VTU.L's total cash of 118.69M.

Cash as Percentage of Revenue

9.01%

Higher than competitor

Better than VTU.L's cash as percentage of revenue of 1.96%.

Receivables

No Data

No DCF data available for this metric in the selected year.

Receivables as Percentage of Revenue

No Data

No DCF data available for this metric in the selected year.

Inventories

41.57M

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's inventories of 1.10B.

Inventories as Percentage of Revenue

33.07%

Higher than competitor

Worse than VTU.L's inventories as percentage of revenue of 18.08%.

Accounts Payable

3.38M

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's accounts payable of 1.06B.

Payables as Percentage of Revenue

2.69%

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's payables as percentage of revenue of 17.45%.

Capital Expenditure

-1.49M

Higher than competitor

Worse than VTU.L's capital expenditure of -32.30M.

CapEx as Percentage of Revenue

-1.18%

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's capex as percentage of revenue of -0.53%.

Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)

7.34%

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's weighted average cost of capital (wacc) of 8.50%.

Cost of Equity

7.37%

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's cost of equity of 9.52%.

Cost of Debt

6.77%

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's cost of debt of 10.95%.

Beta

0.59

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's beta of 1.04.

Diluted Shares Outstanding

77.31M

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's diluted shares outstanding of 361.73M.

Total Debt

5.45M

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's total debt of 207.50M.

Total Equity

400.46M

Higher than competitor

Better than VTU.L's total equity of 199.68M.

Total Capital

405.91M

Lower than competitor

Worse than VTU.L's total capital of 407.18M.

Debt Weighting

1.34%

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's debt weighting of 50.96%.

Equity Weighting

98.66%

Higher than competitor

Better than VTU.L's equity weighting of 49.04%.

EBIAT

8.79M

Lower than competitor

Worse than VTU.L's ebiat of 51.45M.

Unlevered Free Cash Flow

9.40M

Lower than competitor

Worse than VTU.L's unlevered free cash flow of 61.81M.

Long-Term Growth Rate

3.50%

Higher than competitor

Better than VTU.L's long-term growth rate of 2.00%.

Terminal Value

421.17M

Lower than competitor

Worse than VTU.L's terminal value of 1.42B.

Enterprise Value

339.96M

Lower than competitor

Worse than VTU.L's enterprise value of 1.26B.

Net Debt

-3.60M

Lower than competitor

Better than VTU.L's net debt of 136.90M.

Equity Value

343.56M

Lower than competitor

Worse than VTU.L's equity value of 1.12B.

Equity Value Per Share

444.40

Higher than competitor

Better than VTU.L's equity value per share of 309.41.

Select Metric for Chart