PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.69%
Revenue growth below 50% of KETL.L's 60.34%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.28%
Cost growth of 3.28% while KETL.L maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-0.94%
Gross profit decline while KETL.L shows 59.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.32%
G&A change of 11.32% while KETL.L maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.32%
Operating expenses growth less than half of KETL.L's 59.15%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.50%
Total costs growth less than half of KETL.L's 59.15%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
57.14%
Interest expense change of 57.14% while KETL.L maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-60.66%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.75%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.30%
EBITDA margin decline while KETL.L shows 11.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.01%
Operating income decline while KETL.L shows 66.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.57%
Operating margin decline while KETL.L shows 3.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.71%
Pre-tax income decline while KETL.L shows 69.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while KETL.L shows 5.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
622.45%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x KETL.L's 70.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-13.78%
Net income decline while KETL.L shows 69.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.21%
Net margin decline while KETL.L shows 5.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.61%
EPS decline while KETL.L shows 71.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.61%
Diluted EPS decline while KETL.L shows 71.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.