PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.91%
Revenue growth below 50% of KETL.L's 5.10%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-3.22%
Cost reduction while KETL.L shows 10.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
8.10%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x KETL.L's 5.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.13%
Margin expansion while KETL.L shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.69%
G&A growth above 1.5x KETL.L's 26.40%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.69%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x KETL.L's 4.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.72%
Total costs growth above 1.5x KETL.L's 4.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-80.49%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
219.44%
D&A growth while KETL.L reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.09%
EBITDA margin decline while KETL.L shows 0.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.91%
Operating income decline while KETL.L shows 8.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.64%
Operating margin decline while KETL.L shows 2.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
80.49%
Other expenses growth while KETL.L reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.97%
Pre-tax income decline while KETL.L shows 8.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.71%
Pre-tax margin decline while KETL.L shows 3.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.35%
Tax expense growth while KETL.L reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.66%
Net income decline while KETL.L shows 13.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.34%
Net margin decline while KETL.L shows 8.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.12%
EPS decline while KETL.L shows 14.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.12%
Diluted EPS decline while KETL.L shows 14.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.96%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.96%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.