PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
21.62%
Growth of 21.62% while KETL.L shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
25.89%
Cost growth of 25.89% while KETL.L maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
15.26%
Growth of 15.26% while KETL.L shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-5.23%
Margin decline while KETL.L shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.00%
Operating expenses change of 9.00% while KETL.L maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-221.99%
Total costs reduction while KETL.L shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
48.91%
Interest expense change of 48.91% while KETL.L maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
11.06%
D&A change of 11.06% while KETL.L maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
18.66%
EBITDA change of 18.66% while KETL.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-2.43%
EBITDA margin decline while KETL.L shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
20.32%
Income change of 20.32% while KETL.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1.06%
Operating margin decline while KETL.L shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.59%
Other expenses reduction while KETL.L shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
19.02%
Income change of 19.02% while KETL.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-2.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while KETL.L shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.87%
Tax expense reduction while KETL.L shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.46%
Income change of 27.46% while KETL.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
4.80%
Margin change of 4.80% while KETL.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
30.00%
EPS change of 30.00% while KETL.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
30.00%
Diluted EPS change of 30.00% while KETL.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
4.36%
Share count change of 4.36% while KETL.L is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
3.73%
Diluted share change of 3.73% while KETL.L is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.