PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
21.62%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MCB.L's 0.99%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
25.89%
Cost growth above 1.5x MCB.L's 2.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.26%
Positive growth while MCB.L shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MCB.L's 0.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-221.99%
Total costs reduction while MCB.L shows 1.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
48.91%
Interest expense growth while MCB.L reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.06%
D&A growth less than half of MCB.L's 22.22%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
18.66%
EBITDA growth while MCB.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.32%
Operating income growth while MCB.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.59%
Other expenses reduction while MCB.L shows 7.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
19.02%
Pre-tax income growth while MCB.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.87%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
27.46%
Net income growth while MCB.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.80%
Net margin growth while MCB.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.00%
EPS growth while MCB.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MCB.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.36%
Share count reduction below 50% of MCB.L's 3.39%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.73%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MCB.L's 2.66%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.