PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
21.62%
Positive growth while PZC.L shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
25.89%
Cost increase while PZC.L reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
15.26%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PZC.L's 10.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.23%
Margin decline while PZC.L shows 10.77% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PZC.L's 2.39%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-221.99%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
48.91%
Interest expense growth while PZC.L reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.06%
D&A growth less than half of PZC.L's 395.24%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
18.66%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PZC.L's 76.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.43%
EBITDA margin decline while PZC.L shows 77.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
20.32%
Operating income growth below 50% of PZC.L's 123.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.06%
Operating margin decline while PZC.L shows 124.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.59%
Other expenses reduction while PZC.L shows 1.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
19.02%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PZC.L's 220.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while PZC.L shows 221.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.87%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
27.46%
Net income growth below 50% of PZC.L's 143.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.80%
Net margin growth below 50% of PZC.L's 143.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.00%
EPS growth below 50% of PZC.L's 142.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PZC.L's 142.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.36%
Share count reduction below 50% of PZC.L's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.73%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PZC.L's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.