215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
21.62%
Positive growth while SDI.L shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
25.89%
Cost increase while SDI.L reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
15.26%
Positive growth while SDI.L shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.00%
Operating expenses growth while SDI.L reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-221.99%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
48.91%
Interest expense growth while SDI.L reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.06%
D&A growth above 1.5x SDI.L's 3.44%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
18.66%
EBITDA growth while SDI.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.32%
Operating income growth while SDI.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.59%
Other expenses reduction while SDI.L shows 11.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
19.02%
Pre-tax income growth while SDI.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.87%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
27.46%
Net income growth while SDI.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.80%
Net margin growth while SDI.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.00%
EPS growth while SDI.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SDI.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.36%
Share count reduction below 50% of SDI.L's 0.24%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.73%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SDI.L's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.