PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
21.62%
Positive growth while VTU.L shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
25.89%
Cost increase while VTU.L reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
15.26%
Positive growth while VTU.L shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.23%
Margin decline while VTU.L shows 3.35% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x VTU.L's 1.26%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-221.99%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
48.91%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x VTU.L's 12.84%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
11.06%
D&A growth above 1.5x VTU.L's 0.29%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
18.66%
EBITDA growth while VTU.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.32%
Operating income growth while VTU.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.59%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
19.02%
Pre-tax income growth while VTU.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.87%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
27.46%
Net income growth while VTU.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.80%
Net margin growth while VTU.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.00%
EPS growth while VTU.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.00%
Diluted EPS growth while VTU.L declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.36%
Share count increase while VTU.L reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.73%
Diluted share increase while VTU.L reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.