PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.69%
Growth of 1.69% versus flat Consumer Defensive revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
3.28%
Cost growth of 3.28% versus flat Consumer Defensive costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
-0.94%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-2.58%
Margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.32%
G&A change of 11.32% versus flat Consumer Defensive overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.32%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Defensive median of 0.02%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
4.50%
Total costs change of 4.50% versus flat Consumer Defensive costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
57.14%
Interest expense change of 57.14% versus flat Consumer Defensive costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-60.66%
D&A reduction while Consumer Defensive median is 0.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-6.75%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-8.30%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-6.01%
Operating income decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-7.57%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-57.14%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-6.71%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Defensive median is -0.16%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-8.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is -0.67%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
622.45%
Tax expense change of 622.45% versus flat Consumer Defensive. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-13.78%
Net income decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-15.21%
Net margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-13.61%
EPS decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-13.61%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.