PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.91%
Growth of 0.91% versus flat Consumer Defensive revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
-3.22%
Cost reduction while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
8.10%
Growth of 8.10% versus flat Consumer Defensive gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
7.13%
Margin change of 7.13% versus flat Consumer Defensive margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.69%
G&A change of 66.69% versus flat Consumer Defensive overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.69%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Defensive median of 0.27%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
7.72%
Total costs change of 7.72% versus flat Consumer Defensive costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-80.49%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
219.44%
D&A change of 219.44% versus flat Consumer Defensive D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-17.34%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.09%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.91%
Operating income decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-19.64%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
80.49%
Other expenses change of 80.49% versus flat Consumer Defensive. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-17.97%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.71%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
5.35%
Tax expense change of 5.35% versus flat Consumer Defensive. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-24.66%
Net income decline while Consumer Defensive median is -0.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-25.34%
Net margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-21.12%
EPS decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-21.12%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3.96%
Share count reduction while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-3.96%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.