PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
21.62%
Growth of 21.62% versus flat Consumer Defensive revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
25.89%
Cost growth of 25.89% versus flat Consumer Defensive costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
15.26%
Growth of 15.26% versus flat Consumer Defensive gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-5.23%
Margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is -0.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.00%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Defensive median of 1.98%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-221.99%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
48.91%
Interest expense change of 48.91% versus flat Consumer Defensive costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
11.06%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Defensive median of 1.34%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
18.66%
EBITDA growth while Consumer Defensive declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-2.43%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is -2.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
20.32%
Operating income growth while Consumer Defensive declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-1.06%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is -4.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.59%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Defensive median is -2.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
19.02%
Pre-tax income growth while Consumer Defensive declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-2.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Defensive median is -7.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-4.87%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Defensive median is -4.64%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
27.46%
Net income growth while Consumer Defensive declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
4.80%
Net margin growth while Consumer Defensive declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
30.00%
EPS growth while Consumer Defensive declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
30.00%
Diluted EPS growth while Consumer Defensive declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
4.36%
Share count change of 4.36% versus stable Consumer Defensive. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
3.73%
Diluted share change of 3.73% versus stable Consumer Defensive. Walter Schloss would verify approach.