PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
2.32
Similar to SDI.L's ratio of 2.24. Walter Schloss would see both operating with a similar safety margin.
1.03
0.5–0.75x SDI.L's 1.54. Martin Whitman might be concerned about coverage if a crisis hits.
0.25
Below 0.5x SDI.L's 0.68. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
-0.78
Negative interest coverage while SDI.L shows 16.15. Joel Greenblatt would look for earnings improvements and debt restructuring catalysts.
1.00
Short-term coverage of 1.00 while SDI.L has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.