PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
2.32
0.5–0.75x SOM.L's 3.44. Martin Whitman would question if short-term obligations are sufficiently covered.
1.03
Below 0.5x SOM.L's 2.37. Michael Burry might foresee solvency or liquidity crises in a downturn.
0.25
Below 0.5x SOM.L's 1.25. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
-0.78
Negative interest coverage while SOM.L shows 644.81. Joel Greenblatt would look for earnings improvements and debt restructuring catalysts.
1.00
Short-term coverage of 1.00 while SOM.L has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.