PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
4.42
Current Ratio > 1.5x SOM.L's 2.63. David Dodd would confirm if this surplus liquidity is put to good use.
1.80
Similar ratio to SOM.L's 1.94. Walter Schloss might see both running close to industry norms.
0.53
Below 0.5x SOM.L's 1.43. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
-5.00
Negative interest coverage while SOM.L shows 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would look for earnings improvements and debt restructuring catalysts.
1.12
Short-term coverage of 1.12 while SOM.L has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.