215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.43%
Negative ROE while SOM.L stands at 10.81%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.30%
Negative ROA while SOM.L stands at 8.45%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-0.29%
Negative ROCE while SOM.L is at 13.44%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
34.94%
Gross margin 50-75% of SOM.L's 56.78%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
-0.63%
Negative operating margin while SOM.L has 30.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-0.88%
Negative net margin while SOM.L has 23.64%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.