PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-98.83
Negative P/E while PZC.L shows 7.19. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
3.46
P/S 1.1-1.25x PZC.L's 2.91. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior economics.
1.69
Similar P/B to PZC.L's 2.08. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
62.73
P/FCF 50-75% of PZC.L's 115.38. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if capital allocation explains the gap.
51.83
P/OCF 50-75% of PZC.L's 83.71. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
1.69
Similar fair value ratio to PZC.L's 2.08. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-0.25%
Negative earnings while PZC.L shows yield of 3.48%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
1.59%
FCF yield exceeding 1.5x PZC.L's 0.87%. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this premium.