PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-10.64
Negative P/E while PZC.L shows 9.37. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
4.05
P/S 1.25-1.5x PZC.L's 3.04. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better growth prospects.
1.41
P/B 50-75% of PZC.L's 2.46. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
31.15
P/FCF 50-75% of PZC.L's 47.12. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if capital allocation explains the gap.
24.56
P/OCF 50-75% of PZC.L's 42.12. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
1.41
Fair value ratio 50-75% of PZC.L's 2.46. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-2.35%
Negative earnings while PZC.L shows yield of 2.67%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
3.21%
FCF yield exceeding 1.5x PZC.L's 2.12%. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this premium.