PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-10.64
Negative P/E while SOM.L shows 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
4.05
P/S of 4.05 while SOM.L has no sales. Bruce Berkowitz would examine revenue quality advantage.
1.41
P/B of 1.41 while SOM.L has zero book value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset quality advantage.
31.15
P/FCF of 31.15 while SOM.L has no FCF. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cash flow quality advantage.
24.56
P/OCF of 24.56 while SOM.L has no operating cash flow. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational advantage.
1.41
Fair value ratio of 1.41 while SOM.L has zero value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine valuation methodology.
-2.35%
Earnings yield 7-10% - Fair value range. Seth Klarman would verify if yield provides sufficient margin of safety. Check Operating Margins.
3.21%
FCF yield of 3.21% while SOM.L has no FCF. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cash flow quality advantage.