PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Reveals whether the business's core operations generate sufficient cash to cover expenses, fund growth, and return capital to shareholders. Sustainable free cash flow is often a key indicator of long-term value creation.
-0.00
Negative OCF/share while GPRO has 0.06. Joel Greenblatt would question the viability of operations in comparison.
-0.00
Negative FCF/share while GPRO stands at 0.05. Joel Greenblatt would demand structural changes or cost cuts.
-90.91%
Negative ratio while GPRO is 5.46%. Joel Greenblatt would question whether the firm’s OCF is negative or capex is abnormally large.
-0.54
Both companies are negative. Martin Whitman might see an entire niche with questionable earnings quality.
-2.24%
Negative ratio while GPRO is 5.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s revenues or cash flows are fundamentally flawed.