PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.81%
Negative net income growth while GPRO stands at 531.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
17.49%
D&A growth of 17.49% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-70.55%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.02%
Working capital change of 20.02% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-432.20%
AR is negative yoy while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
1755.00%
Inventory growth of 1755.00% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
661.84%
AP growth of 661.84% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-62.22%
Negative yoy usage while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.33%
Negative yoy CFO while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-18.16%
Negative yoy CapEx while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.44%
Purchases growth of 16.44% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
9.69%
Liquidation growth of 9.69% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
200.00%
Growth of 200.00% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
64.96%
We expand invests by 64.96% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
314.29%
Issuance growth of 314.29% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.