PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-42.73%
Negative net income growth while GPRO stands at 14.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-16.15%
Negative yoy D&A while GPRO is 13.94%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-5.78%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GPRO stands at 69.35%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-2.78%
Negative yoy SBC while GPRO is 10.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-222.86%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GPRO at -62.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-83.52%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GPRO at -118.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
266.67%
Inventory growth well above GPRO's 2.79%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-901.88%
Negative yoy AP while GPRO is 98.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
955.17%
Some yoy usage while GPRO is negative at -109.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
80.00%
Well above GPRO's 126.67%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-57.76%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with GPRO at -36.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.12%
CapEx growth well above GPRO's 51.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
37.21%
Some acquisitions while GPRO is negative at -31.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
19.92%
Purchases growth of 19.92% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-13.70%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GPRO at -55.99%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
86.05%
We have some outflow growth while GPRO is negative at -55.99%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
33.20%
We have mild expansions while GPRO is negative at -4164.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24500.00%
We slightly raise equity while GPRO is negative at -86.65%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
2.86%
Buyback growth of 2.86% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.