PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.62%
Some net income increase while GPRO is negative at -11.19%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.87%
Some D&A expansion while GPRO is negative at -12.85%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-112.05%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GPRO stands at 897.69%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-2.28%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GPRO at -2.92%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
228.29%
Slight usage while GPRO is negative at -36.21%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-4852.94%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GPRO at -168.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-166.89%
Negative yoy inventory while GPRO is 60.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
6475.98%
AP growth well above GPRO's 0.25%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
70.30%
Growth well above GPRO's 65.49%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while GPRO is 151.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
51.65%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of GPRO's 130.43%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-39.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -19.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-2416.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-12.17%
Negative yoy purchasing while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
5.11%
Below 50% of GPRO's 206.77%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
268.80%
Growth well above GPRO's 206.77%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-65.48%
We reduce yoy invests while GPRO stands at 559.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-190.42%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.72%
Buyback growth of 40.72% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.