PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.62%
Net income growth under 50% of GPRO's 1243.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.82%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with GPRO at -25.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-147.66%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GPRO stands at 100.96%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.53%
SBC growth while GPRO is negative at -4.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
1001.63%
Slight usage while GPRO is negative at -39.60%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
182.81%
AR growth well above GPRO's 99.60%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
80.12%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. GPRO's 273.88%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
146.07%
A yoy AP increase while GPRO is negative at -106.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
1.41%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. GPRO's 69.50%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-101.82%
Both negative yoy, with GPRO at -39.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
26.46%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x GPRO's 6.73%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-13.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while GPRO is 86.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
84.96%
Acquisition growth of 84.96% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
39.13%
Purchases growth of 39.13% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-4.88%
We reduce yoy sales while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
62.08%
Growth of 62.08% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
207.09%
Investing outflow well above GPRO's 86.61%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-421.61%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.16%
We cut yoy buybacks while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.