PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
32.43%
Net income growth under 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
20.51%
D&A growth well above SONO's 4.69%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-64.94%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.28%
SBC growth while SONO is negative at -3.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
2.92%
Less working capital growth vs. SONO's 75.63%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-267.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONO at -216.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
64.14%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SONO's 311.49%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
23.50%
AP growth of 23.50% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
58.08%
Growth well above SONO's 106.61%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.37%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONO's 162.75%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-29.87%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 14.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
92.07%
Acquisition growth of 92.07% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-1.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -14.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
9.53%
At 50-75% of SONO's 17.04%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
152.17%
Growth of 152.17% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
19.28%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 10.51%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -150.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.