PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
62.47%
Net income growth under 50% of SONO's 339.10%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-11.42%
Negative yoy D&A while SONO is 1.03%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-15.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONO stands at 136.69%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
14.08%
SBC growth well above SONO's 1.18%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
96.53%
Well above SONO's 86.56% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
122.98%
AR growth while SONO is negative at -142.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
96.43%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SONO's 205.78%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-106.09%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONO at -133.28%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
552.32%
Some yoy usage while SONO is negative at -220.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
54.49%
Some yoy increase while SONO is negative at -113.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
53.27%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONO's 1125.15%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
24.13%
Some CapEx rise while SONO is negative at -74.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-7269.23%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-106.75%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
29.29%
Liquidation growth of 29.29% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
74.44%
Growth of 74.44% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-1612.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -464.47%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
63.39%
Debt repayment at 75-90% of SONO's 75.00%. Bill Ackman urges more debt clearance to match competitor’s lower leverage.
-99.49%
Negative yoy issuance while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-18.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -218.57%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.