PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-49.41%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONO at -173.93%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-1.07%
Negative yoy D&A while SONO is 6.82%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
13.47%
Some yoy growth while SONO is negative at -54.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.76%
Negative yoy SBC while SONO is 1.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-147.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONO at -319.11%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
161.49%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. SONO's 401.66%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
2696.43%
Some inventory rise while SONO is negative at -101.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-1041.51%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONO at -274.08%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-75.84%
Negative yoy usage while SONO is 89.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
17.61%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SONO's 767.11%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-56.38%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONO at -170.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
12.06%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SONO's 37.88%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
81.63%
Acquisition spending well above SONO's 98.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
22.30%
Purchases growth of 22.30% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
49.81%
Liquidation growth of 49.81% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-76.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
165.94%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 79.52%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-251.24%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
21300.00%
Issuance growth of 21300.00% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
10.30%
We have some buyback growth while SONO is negative at -544.62%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.