229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONO at -93.06%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.48%
Less D&A growth vs. SONO's 3.88%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-40.47%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-0.57%
Negative yoy SBC while SONO is 21.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-131.45%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONO at -604.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
340.87%
AR growth well above SONO's 183.82%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-43.61%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONO at -195.20%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-208.83%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONO at -177.96%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-64.29%
Negative yoy usage while SONO is 109.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-211.98%
Negative yoy while SONO is 205.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-40.03%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONO at -154.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
10.31%
Some CapEx rise while SONO is negative at -46.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.45%
Purchases growth of 22.45% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-5.91%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.48%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONO's 100.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
42.47%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 72.17%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-75.10%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -24.48%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.