PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.74%
Net income growth under 50% of SONO's 359.11%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
7.35%
Some D&A expansion while SONO is negative at -14.64%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.17%
SBC growth well above SONO's 11.84%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
118.53%
Less working capital growth vs. SONO's 1301.63%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
170.51%
AR growth while SONO is negative at -126.52%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-114.39%
Negative yoy inventory while SONO is 410.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-130.48%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONO at -117.29%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.70%
Both negative yoy, with SONO at -100.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
84.72%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONO's 1140.82%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-10.59%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 40.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
5.00%
Liquidation growth of 5.00% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
51.37%
Growth well above SONO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-19.51%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 40.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-99.90%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONO is 55.33%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.