PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.31%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONO at -186.12%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.42%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONO at -5.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.10%
Negative yoy SBC while SONO is 22.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-613.27%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONO at -149.49%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-82.12%
AR is negative yoy while SONO is 177.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
238.69%
Some inventory rise while SONO is negative at -103.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-167.90%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONO at -1000.04%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.71%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SONO's 234241.82%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-43.13%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONO at -140.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
16.56%
Some CapEx rise while SONO is negative at -67.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.05%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
20.93%
Liquidation growth of 20.93% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-56.69%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-116.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -812.72%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
20.98%
Debt repayment growth of 20.98% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -128.66%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.