PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-9.26%
Negative net income growth while SONO stands at 105.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.49%
Less D&A growth vs. SONO's 7.03%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.21%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SONO at -7.36%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
102.52%
Well above SONO's 133.12% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-187.88%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-106.32%
Negative yoy inventory while SONO is 568.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
112.65%
AP growth well above SONO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.43%
Some yoy increase while SONO is negative at -101.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
27.18%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONO's 157.07%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-7.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -127.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.61%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. SONO's 48.33%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-11.21%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
12.81%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONO's 144.17%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
59.03%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 52.02%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-3.34%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.29%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONO is 3.63%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.