PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.29%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONO at -1531.46%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.14%
Less D&A growth vs. SONO's 43.14%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.38%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SONO at -11.84%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
4457.24%
Slight usage while SONO is negative at -124.23%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-2127.28%
AR is negative yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-8958.33%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONO at -398.93%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
1276.93%
AP growth of 1276.93% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
319.59%
Some yoy usage while SONO is negative at -786.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-119.53%
Negative yoy while SONO is 377.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-7.09%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONO at -159.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-35.19%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 32.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.80%
Purchases well above SONO's 6.74%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-2.06%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
50.77%
We have some outflow growth while SONO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
1237.80%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 35.78%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
178.64%
Debt repayment growth of 178.64% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.43%
Buyback growth below 50% of SONO's 91.89%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.