PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
120.77%
Net income growth similar to SONY's 123.18%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-8.33%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 1.08%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
116.30%
Well above SONY's 148.18% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-137.50%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 37.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-138.28%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-8.33%
Negative yoy inventory while SONY is 12.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
162.31%
AP growth of 162.31% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-50.00%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 391.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
93.10%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -110.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-238.46%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 363.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
22.73%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 10.97%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
74.32%
Acquisition growth of 74.32% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-88.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -239.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
33.27%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -7.12%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-33.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -3.21%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-22.66%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
400.00%
Issuance growth of 400.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.