PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
333.33%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -24.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-6.45%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 7.94%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-800.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.63%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 131.85%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-92.65%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
200.00%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 75.65%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
210.64%
AP growth of 210.64% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
83.33%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SONY's 229.06%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-266.67%
Negative yoy while SONY is 280.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-10.91%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 930.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.24%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -14.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
25.16%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -30.99%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-33.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 761.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
194.09%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -99.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.92%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.