PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
35.71%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 183.57%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-17.24%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 12.76%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
71.43%
Well above SONY's 43.80% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
600.00%
SBC growth of 600.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-142.31%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -216.81%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1620.00%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-139.42%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
50.00%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -299.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
50.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SONY's 115.95%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-91.84%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 7.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-15.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 3.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-108.98%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 13.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-14.56%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -2.64%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
200.00%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -92.41%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-89.38%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 10.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
400.00%
Issuance growth of 400.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.