229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
115.79%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -188.34%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-16.67%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
225.00%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -6.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
115.15%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 484.85%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-160.53%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-700.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -29.11%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
768.29%
AP growth of 768.29% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-1400.00%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 208.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
140.00%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -6.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
812.50%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SONY's 43.87%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-26.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -12.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.55%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -76.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-44.73%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 17.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 233.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-343.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -103.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.67%
Issuance growth of 46.67% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.