PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.12%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 489.62%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
14.00%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -44.84%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
807.69%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -81.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-11.90%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
150.54%
Well above SONY's 43.10% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-148.51%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-122.50%
Negative yoy inventory while SONY is 172.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
151.40%
AP growth of 151.40% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
119.34%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -108.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-166.67%
Negative yoy while SONY is 62.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
905.60%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SONY's 242.35%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-22.80%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 24.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 14.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-59.87%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -34.93%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
188.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 2464.57%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-78.43%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 14.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.13%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.