229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.83%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -139.47%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
15.79%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 72.01%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-225.42%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
8.11%
SBC growth of 8.11% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
67.69%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 291.88%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
28.51%
AR growth of 28.51% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-533.33%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -207.64%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
116.54%
AP growth of 116.54% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-10.98%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 257.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
600.00%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -46.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
4.77%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONY's 66.50%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
38.82%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -48.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-369.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 8.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-76.50%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -38.21%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-186.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -46.59%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-613.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -76.12%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.76%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.