PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.08%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONY at -638.26%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
12.84%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -0.79%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-21.11%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
5.66%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -26.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-298.88%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 157.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-132.40%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-114.93%
Negative yoy inventory while SONY is 318.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
76.15%
AP growth of 76.15% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
6.29%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -354.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.10%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONY at -28.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-96.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 21.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
19.57%
Purchases well above SONY's 10.69%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-17.10%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 13.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
42.86%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 1460.10%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
14.96%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 29.74%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.42%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.