PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.81%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONY at -78.68%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
17.49%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -8.95%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-70.55%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 786.07%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.02%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 1512.80%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-432.20%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
1755.00%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -80.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
661.84%
AP growth of 661.84% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-62.22%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 162.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.33%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 75.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-18.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -24.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.44%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -25.61%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
9.69%
Below 50% of SONY's 36.48%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
200.00%
Growth well above SONY's 128.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
64.96%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -45.55%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
314.29%
Issuance growth of 314.29% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.