PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.00%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 77.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.55%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 93.03%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-34.01%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
5.50%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -13.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-101.25%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 82.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
775.75%
AR growth of 775.75% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
131.63%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 66.69%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-271.96%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-104.35%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 101.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.62%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 393.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
6.35%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 4.28%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
94.72%
Acquisition growth of 94.72% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-18.23%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 7.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
20.81%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SONY's 5.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
21.15%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -301.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-6.18%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 21.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.84%
Issuance growth of 161.84% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.