PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.87%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 3124.52%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.25%
D&A growth well above SONY's 6.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-343.92%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 1984.53%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.98%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 2.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
175.41%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 399.31%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-142.91%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 263.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
85.18%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -24.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
2326.42%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -23.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
140.15%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SONY's 4444.66%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.57%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SONY's 52.80%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-14.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -6.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
63.19%
Some acquisitions while SONY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
37.84%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -9.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-22.85%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 84.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
129.47%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 1885.30%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
109.39%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 106.29%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
225.00%
Issuance growth of 225.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
69.31%
Buyback growth of 69.31% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.